How to solve the fertility crisis

Jared Taylor is making a big comeback; which is great. Based boomer is based. He made this tweet about a single white woman getting IVF and accidentally being given a black embryo. Our culture has completely fallen by the same degree to which our technology has advanced.

That is quite terrible and she should give that animal precious baby back to the genetic parents or up for adoption. She wanted to keep it because emotions overwhelm logic in most women. [deleted harsh criticisms and insults]. Fortunately, the genetic parents won custody in a lawsuit and saved this woman from herself. Black power!

I’m not sure how common mislabeling embryos is, it probably happens more than people would like. There is at least one case of a Jewish doctor intentionally using his own sperm instead of the selected donor. I don’t really want to talk about this particular absurd situation though or even IVF in general. Using this technology is a symptom of another problem. Why aren’t stable relationships forming so that women don’t end up as spinsters desperately turning to Jewish doctors to have a baby at 39 and a half with no man in sight? A lot of ink is being spilled about dropping fertility rates all over the world recently. Its not just a US or Western problem.

There are actually a number of reasons. No-fault divorce, alimony, child support abuse, cultural pressures, propaganda, the birth control pill, unchecked immigration putting massive pressure on the labor market which suppresses wages and raises rents simultaneously, poisoning food with high fructose corn syrup and other fatatives. Poisoning bread with potassium bromide, which is a sedative and probably makes everyone less active. Fluoride in all the water and EVERY brand of toothpaste can’t be good either. God I fucking hate our government so much I want to pull my hair out.

All the above are true, especially about the hair, and addressing these problems would have a positive impact on stable relationship formation, but there is one thing that is the single most important factor: Female Employment. Making every possible profession (and pre-requisite schooling) open to women has a number of negative effects with respect to fertility:

1. A woman with a reasonably compensated job has no direct need for a man. This allows her to be way more picky than is reasonable. She perceives no urgency in terms of material needs for selecting a husband and so pathologically passes over every appropriate and attainable candidate she comes across in the hope she will find the fictional character from her romance novel. She also tastes a lot of unobtainable “candidates.” Assuming she makes it past that hurdle, she has little incentive to tough out relationship crises as opposed to just leaving the man. Her standard of living probably won’t go down very much. So women often do leave and destroy their own fertility in the process. If Tom Brady isn’t good enough, then no man is good enough. Female psychology must be a hell of a drug. Every time this happens that is several fertile years down the drain while she has to find a new man and vet him.
   .
2. Women in these professions are directly competing against men for a limited number of positions. If acceptance to schools, training programs, and jobs was completely merit based this wouldn’t actually matter that much. For really male suited professions maybe 5% of women would qualify on merit. If that. Fire fighter, cop, soldier, mathematician, medical doctor, engineer, chemist, etc. There is obviously going to be variation by profession. However, hiring is not based on merit but on filling quotas. A man can’t compete against quotas because it isn’t a competition. The outcomes are zero-sum and the process prevents a lot of men from really achieving to their full potential. That is, creating personal value to a sufficient degree that they can pass the hypergamy test for the women in their area. Of course, women “earning/achieving” [lmao] more also raises the hypergamy bar for what men have to earn/achieve at the same time the opportunities to do so are being limited. Men might not be that much different than they were in the past, but the female perception of appropriate men is extremely skewed. Lacking logic, most women aren’t very well equipped to navigate this systematic distortion of society in a personally pro-fertility direction.
   .
3. Education and employment are directly competing with child production for a woman’s time. This is fairly simple and obvious. Being pregnant and raising young children is a very limiting condition that lasts for years. You can’t do this and also do full-time employment and education. Every year a young woman spends in education and career is a year she can’t be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. The number of years she has available to be barefoot and pregnant are also very limited. Biologically speaking, that is between the ages of 15 and 40 being very generous at the tail there. Again, this competition for time is zero-sum. Not spending most of this time barefoot and pregnant is bad for fertility. If we want more fertility, we need less education and career for women. No way around it.

For those who don’t believe me about female suitability to professions, I wrote a whole book about this which has 300 citations. It discusses sex differences in intellectual, emotional and physical attributes that affect the suitability to various tasks and professions. In short, women are on average less suitable and in the extremes of genius and physical prowess nearly absent. Actually, physically they are pretty much absent from the male average too. The book is meant to be taken as a whole, but skip to the chapter “Beyond intelligence: additional traits which make promoting education and careers to women unaffordable” if you are in a hurry. Here are some other articles.

Having identified the number 1 factor behind the fertility crisis allows us to know exactly what needs to be done to reverse it. 80-95% of all professions need to be completely off-limits to women. Even with extreme limits on female employment, spinsterhood has never been wholly preventable in any culture so some (low-status) outlets for incorrigible women should be available just so their nuisance factor can be manageable. The best social planners to have ever existed probably couldn’t make 100% of women marriable. There are also female appropriate professions like nursing, waitress, and pole dancer which presumably lubricates the marriage pipeline rather than block it. Well, maybe not that last one actually… While probably no longer appropriate today, spinster was originally just such a job which is why it has been passed down as the wonderful pejorative that it is.

100% of high-earning and high-status professions must be off limits to women. This is what would naturally happen anyway if merit was the only metric considered in training and work. Any and all laws which coerces and funding which promotes the hiring of women need to be abolished. Additionally, discrimination against women may need to be codified for a few years to undo the cultural damage that’s baked into our society at this point. Otherwise the pain may last longer than it needs to. However, just getting the government out of the role of punishing/promoting hiring decisions would eventually restore proper balance. Politician especially needs to be off the table. There has never been a worse system of government conceived than rule by old women. While its debatable if pole dancers are acceptable, poll dancers certainly are not. Female leadership is an oxymoron.

Once women had to face a choice of near-poverty and misery working a shit left-over job or a husband and that choice started at day 1 of puberty, the problems with marriage and fertility would vanish in a couple of years. They wouldn’t have a choice really, so they would do their duty and produce the next generation. Anyone crying about the fertility crisis and not talking about removing female “rights” to employment is simply not very serious about the problem. Can’t have your cake and eat it too. If they aren’t for the actual solution then they are wasting our time and their own time. They should be told to get serious or stfu. Banning women from men’s professions is philosophically no different from banning men from women’s sports. That has already been done and everyone supports it.

On some possible objections:

1. “bubububut women should have free choice cause libertaretard reasons”
   • You either want to solve the fertility crisis or you don’t. Anything less and the crisis continues. Them’s the breaks. Throwing a tantrum or reciting sophistry won’t change that.
2. “What about the 5% who DO qualify for jobs on merit? Shouldn’t every woman be offered the chance to waste everyone’s time including her own finding out if she is in that 5%?”
   • No. It wastes everyone’s time and money, not least the woman’s herself. See my book about what relatively highly qualified female doctors do with their 10 years of training and hundreds of thousands of governmental gibs. In short, its tough shit for the very small number of women who might actually be an asset to some profession. Most won’t be and the cost of identifying that 5% is too high. Often that 5% opts out from the profession eventually anyway. Lastly, that top 5% of women are exactly the ones you want breeding the most because the sons they produce will contribute far more to society than she ever could herself no matter how talented she is.
3. What about after child bearing age? Shouldn’t women be allowed to do whatever then?
   • A good question. Marriage is primarily about ensuring children are raised in a good environment. Once the nest is empty there isn’t much reason to “keep women down.” It wouldn’t change anything about suitability mentioned earlier, so a lot of jobs would be off limits regardless. I could potentially understand arguments for work roles for menopausal empty nesters. Going back to nursing or something. I will just leave that an open question. The point of this is to get women having babies during the years they are meant to have them. What happens after can be figured out later.
4. 15 year old girls getting married is pedophilia!
   • Age of marriage is kind of a separate discussion, and ultimately it wouldn’t matter much if a minimum was set to 18. The main problem with 15 year old girls having sex is that they are very prone to pair-bond hard with the first guy they are with. If that relationship doesn’t last it causes a lot of psychological damage that mostly is irrecoverable and it contributes to fertility loss. What needs preventing is rakes with no investment from doing this damage and disappearing into the night. It was always appropriate for a husband. Husbands in traditional marriage were expected to take care of wives for the rest of their lives and taking advantage of this early pair-bonding is helpful. From when she is 15 and until he dies, leaving her an inheritance for maintenance. If you insist on waiting 3-5 years between the onset of puberty and marrying a girl off you would also have to watch her really closely to prevent poor pair-bonding from occurring. Pick your poison. Pragmatically, its easier to just get her married at 15 probably to about a 22 year old man already situated in a career. Again though, this a separate discussion about perfect tweaking and is irrelevant to ending female employment.
5. “Bubububut all the other stuff on your list is really important too! Alimony and divorce and so on”
   • Ya, they matter, and fixing them will incrementally help fix the fertility crisis. The point of this essay is which factor matters most. Female employment wins this competition hands down.
6. Immigrants are the real problem because they take all the jobs and suppress wages.
   • This is a very big problem and the best contender for being as or more important than female employment. Its debatable, but I believe female employment matters just a little bit more because it takes the same labor supply excess problem and adds to it wasting female time on things not related to being barefoot and pregnant. It directly exacerbates my second point. Its mostly men migrating too increasing intra-sex competition for women which exacerbates the problems with declining female attractiveness. Both stopping and reversing white genocide through replacement is absolutely critical. Both my fertility crisis proposal as well as ending replacement migration needs to be done. Not mutually exclusive. We would all be amazed how much wages would go up if both of these were done in tandem. The average man would be able to support a family on a single income earned with 40-50 hours of work a week! Imagine that!
7. Would you stop women from starting their own businesses?
   • No I wouldn’t, actually. This would sort itself out quite naturally without any outside effort whatsoever and plan b would be find a husband. There would be a lot of husband finding for aspiring female business founders. It also allows that 5% mentioned earlier a crack to show their worth and without wasting anyone else’s money or time. Making it so she could only hire men would also increase her chances of successfully launching the business because she won’t accidentally waste time on other women who won’t play nice with her and wouldn’t be as talented as male employees. Special government contracts for female and minority businesses absolutely can not be allowed to distort the market though.
8. Women would never vote for this
   • This is an essay about what would need to change to fix the fertility crisis, not how to convince anyone to make the needed changes. But ya, we do need to repeal the 19th amendment because women can’t be trusted with decision making authority. As for how to do that….
9. “Bubububut the women are going to be mad!”
   • Listening to women has probably been the single greatest mistake any civilization has ever made. If your women aren’t mad, it means you are making bad decisions and your culture is about to collapse. Making things better means ignoring female hysteria, making them mad, telling them no and to stfu. This in itself will likely make them horny and contribute to fixing the fertility crisis. If all men collectively just told them no there is absolutely not shit women could do about it. They wouldn’t win a fight. They would do what the men told them or they would get slapped until they did what the men told them. Islam is right about women in that respect. That either happens or there will be no solution to the fertility crisis.

And to finish things off, either something of this sort happens consciously and we preserve part of our civilization, or collapse induced chaos so limits the coercive reach of central planners that the natural balance returns on its own. None of this shit would have been remotely possible without a strong central government putting a 500 pound safe on the scale.