This will be a short post. I just want to draw attention to yet another example of people not following the “right” narrative being bullied, badgered, pressured and purged.
Part of the “acceptable” narrative is that all races (and genders) are equal in every conceivable way. Not just in terms of being treated fairly before the law, but also in potential for success or potential for crime. When one group statistically commits more crimes than other groups, this axiom is violated. The strategy of progressives is not to look at this information and reject the axiom, but to double down and create rationalizations that allow the axiom to coexist with facts that clearly debunk it.
It is well known (and empirically verified) that blacks commit more crimes than whites, and that in interracial violence blacks are much more commonly the aggressor against the out-group, especially whites, than vice versa. This is a clear violation of the axiom that all groups are equally criminally, or equally non-criminal. In love with their axiom, progressives invent (rationalize) nonsense theories and hypotheses such as white privilege and systematic racism to explain the disparity and keep their axiom too. Of course that is bullshit, and genetics is in the process of showing these differences are innate. Once enough “warrior” alleles at various gene locations are identified, it is almost certain blacks will have a greater frequency of them than most other groups and that will be determined to be the true cause of their higher likelihood for violent crime.
There are people out there who actively work against the progressives and make the information about the reality of inter-racial violence, and especially black violence, known. Jared Taylor and John Derbyshire for example. Another such person is Colin Flaherty, author of ‘White Girl Bleed A Lot’: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It and ‘Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry’: The hoax of black victimization and those who enable it.. In these books he demonstrates the reality and extent of black on white violence and how much more often whites are the victims of blacks rather than the other way around.
In addition to these important books, he also had a youtube channel which posted videos, both privately recorded and found in the media, which demonstrated both black violence and the media’s blatant attempts to white wash the truth. This channel was gaining popularity at a very rapid rate because the general public could not access this information as a result of collusion in the mainstream media to cover it up.
“My channel documents how the media ignore, deny, condone, excuse, encourage and even lie about these kinds of crimes. I filled a vacuum, and the people responded to that.
“And all of this was based on facts and evidence. We produced videos, 9-1-1 calls, police reports, eyewitness accounts and statements from victims who all said the same thing. ‘Something very wrong is happening here, and we have to pay attention to it,’”
“My YouTube channel was getting 1 million views a month, generating about 5 to 10 million minutes of viewing. There were 25,000 to 50,000 comments a month, and 15,000 subscribers. And all of those numbers were growing 20 percent per month,” he said.
“This channel satisfied a craving for real information about black-on-white crime and black-on-white hostility that has reached epidemic levels. And I don’t apologize for pointing out the obvious: black mob violence and black-on-white crime is wildly out of proportion.”
When a white is the perpetrator of some crime the race is readily reported, but when a black is a perpetrator, the only information we get is “a man” or “youths” or “teenagers” and the public is left wondering the ethnicity of the perp. Well, not many people are dumb enough not to know implicitly. Most average people, white or otherwise, have easily figured out that when a description is intentionally vague it usually means a black is responsible (though Hispanics also will get similar treatment their crime rate is lower than blacks).
Colin Flaherty’s work goes against the progressive narrative of the cathedral, which makes it a prime target for censorship. His work shows the reality of race relations today and calls into question both the axiom of equality and the rationalization that whites are the aggressors and thus are at fault. Such crimethink is not something progressives will tolerate, at least not for long and so now Flaherty’s work is no longer available from youtube. A platform which has a great potential for the truth to be made known. This is unfortunate for those who value truth above sentiment, but in this case the truth wants to be free and will continue becoming more widely known despite this bump in the road.Find other great dissident right content with the two Atavisionary RSS feeds: Atavisions and Prolific Atavisions. In addition, download the free ebook Smart and Sexy to learn what, how and why there are biologically based cognitive differences between the sexes
2 Replies to “Cathedral Censorship in Action: Colin Flaherty banned from Youtube”
Amazing Video debate – Kosher Alt Right Alex Jones Libertarian ism v Christian Euro Identity Politics Dr David Duke
OT: Atavisionary, I just wanted to say that I think you’re one of the best writers in the Reactosphere. Most of the writing in neoreactionary circles is needlessly esoteric and often covers topics which are completely unimportant. Most neoreactionary writing uses as many multi-syllable words and cryptic references as possible, and it just strikes me as try hard pseudo-intellectualism. There have been countless times where after I’ve finished reading a neoreactionary blog post, I feel like it was a complete waste of time and no insight was gained whatsoever. Because of this, I’ve cut down my RSS over the years. I think the material that you, SOBL, jim, Antidem and a handful of others put out is exceptional. I know I’m being hard on some people here, but it’s my way of encouraging and showing gratitude for the work you produce.
On a more important note, I recall reading that one of the major strategies of neoreaction is to convince the elite that monarchy is the best system so they can implement it. I’m not sure if anyone has already noticed, but one of the most successful hedge fund managers has stated on the record that communism never works no matter how many times it’s attempted, and more importantly, that monarchy is a better system than democracy.
Take a few minutes and watch these clips:
Peter Schiff on the failure of democracy
Peter Schiff on why the majority is usually wrong
Peter Schiff on why monarchy is a better system
Peter Schiff on why communism never works
Perhaps it wouldn’t be such a bad idea for one of the more well-known figures of neoreaction, maybe Henry Dampier, to reach out to Peter Schiff. It seems to me that high functioning executive types would be a natural fit with neoreaction. They experience firsthand how institutions are much more effective when run by a CEO vs. being run by a mob.